Difference between revisions of "Talk:No Child Left Behind"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(rather short on specifics) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
:Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | :Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. [[User:RobS|RobS]] 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. [[User:Czolgolz|Czolgolz]] 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 17:52, May 14, 2007
It's not just NEA criticism, if you look at the sources. If I include other sources, can we stick with 'educator criticism'? Czolgolz 12:42, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
- Sure looks to me like the NEA's website, and it's rather short on specifics as to why NEA has trouble carrying out its job mandated by law. RobS 13:20, 14 May 2007 (EDT)
I'll include more sources. And that's the whole point. If the law is flawed, then of course they'll be trouble carrying it out. Czolgolz 13:52, 14 May 2007 (EDT)