SkipCaptcha
235
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 11:
Line 11: + +
Trump stops training
==Relationship with "White Fragility"==
==Relationship with "White Fragility"==
According to Karmazov, woke fragility owes "its existence to Robin DiAngelo’s seminal 2011 paper on White Fragility, without which my theory of Woke Fragility would have been impossible to formulate."<ref name=woke/> Some people argue that the essay was intended as a satirical attack on DiAngelo's book ''White Fragility''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrqGDrghnFg|title=Falsifying Wokeness with King Crocoduck|accessdate=2020-08-31}}</ref> Certainly, most white people find the attack on Woke Folk made by the Woke Fragility theory to be more valid and realistic than the attack on white people made by the White Fragility theory. However, by definition, neither theory offers any empirical way of validating or choosing one over the other. Given the critical epistemology theory of making everything relative to subjective viewpoints, Woke Fragility theory will win out over White Fragility theory because the world's population of white people is greater than the population of Woke Folk. Any effort to deny this obvious truth (or to delete it from this article) would be an improper exercise of Woke Privilege.
According to Karmazov, woke fragility owes "its existence to Robin DiAngelo’s seminal 2011 paper on White Fragility, without which my theory of Woke Fragility would have been impossible to formulate."<ref name=woke/> Some people argue that the essay was intended as a satirical attack on DiAngelo's book ''White Fragility''.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zrqGDrghnFg|title=Falsifying Wokeness with King Crocoduck|accessdate=2020-08-31}}</ref> Certainly, most white people find the attack on Woke Folk made by the Woke Fragility theory to be more valid and realistic than the attack on white people made by the White Fragility theory. However, by definition, neither theory offers any empirical way of validating or choosing one over the other. Given the critical epistemology theory of making everything relative to subjective viewpoints, Woke Fragility theory will win out over White Fragility theory because the world's population of white people is greater than the population of Woke Folk. Any effort to deny this obvious truth (or to delete it from this article) would be an improper exercise of Woke Privilege.
Human Resources staff in federal departments and agencies used their Woke Privilege to require training of employees to become woke. In response, President Trump took action to curb federal spending on such training. On September 4, 2020, President Trump ordered federal executive branch departments to halt employee training based upon [[critical race theory]] (and the order probably includes many forms of [[anti-racism]] theory). Russ Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote a memo announcing Trump's instruction to stop using controversial forms of training on “critical race theory,” “white privilege” and “any other training or propaganda effort that teaches or suggests either...that the United States is an inherently racist or evil country or...that any race or ethnicity is inherently racist or evil.” Vought added, “These types of ‘trainings’ not only run counter to the fundamental beliefs for which our Nation has stood since its inception, but they also engender division and resentment within the Federal workforce."<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-ends-critical-race-theory-training-federal-employees|title=Trump ends 'critical race theory' training for federal employees, calls it a 'sickness'|date=September 5, 2020|work=Fox News|accessdate=2020-09-05}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|first=Benjamin|last=Boyce|title=Trump BANS Critical Race Theory!|url=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXA78x3ek-E|date=September 5, 2020|accessdate=2020-09-05}}</ref>
==References==
==References==
<references/>
<references/>
[[Category:Bigotry]]
[[Category:Bigotry]]