Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,679 bytes added ,  23:33, October 10, 2020
no edit summary
Line 5: Line 5:  
After Li-Meng Yan appeared on ''[[Tucker Carlson Tonight]]'',<ref>https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/doctor-who-fled-china-to-reveal-virus-truth/news-story/0ebf5993691da3ffb612438ecf8bd6c3</ref> where she asserted that the [[Communist Chinese]] government intentionally manufactured and released the coronavirus,<ref>https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-facebook-censor-chinese-virologist</ref> [[Facebook]] censored [[Fox News]], [[Twitter]] banned Li-Meng Yan,<ref>https://youtu.be/bhE74pbGTM0</ref> [[PolitiFake]] attempted to discredit her,<ref>[https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/16/li-meng-yan/tucker-carlson-guest-airs-debunked-conspiracy-theo/ Li-Meng Yan stated on September 15, 2020 in an interview on “Tucker Carlson Tonight”: “This virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab.”]</ref> and the [[Chinese Communist Party]] arrested Li-Meng Yan's mother.<ref>https://gnews.org/400434/</ref>  
 
After Li-Meng Yan appeared on ''[[Tucker Carlson Tonight]]'',<ref>https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/doctor-who-fled-china-to-reveal-virus-truth/news-story/0ebf5993691da3ffb612438ecf8bd6c3</ref> where she asserted that the [[Communist Chinese]] government intentionally manufactured and released the coronavirus,<ref>https://www.foxnews.com/media/tucker-facebook-censor-chinese-virologist</ref> [[Facebook]] censored [[Fox News]], [[Twitter]] banned Li-Meng Yan,<ref>https://youtu.be/bhE74pbGTM0</ref> [[PolitiFake]] attempted to discredit her,<ref>[https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2020/sep/16/li-meng-yan/tucker-carlson-guest-airs-debunked-conspiracy-theo/ Li-Meng Yan stated on September 15, 2020 in an interview on “Tucker Carlson Tonight”: “This virus, COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 virus, actually is not from nature. It is a man-made virus created in the lab.”]</ref> and the [[Chinese Communist Party]] arrested Li-Meng Yan's mother.<ref>https://gnews.org/400434/</ref>  
   −
In October 2020 Dr. Li0Meng Yan published a second co-authored report, alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was not only created in a Wuhan lab, it's an "unrestricted [[bioweapon]]" which was intentionally released.
+
In October 2020 Dr. Li-Meng Yan published a second co-authored report, alleging that SARS-CoV-2 was not only created in a Wuhan lab, it's an "unrestricted [[bioweapon]]" which was intentionally released.<ref>https://www.zerohedge.com/medical/covid-19-unrestricted-bioweapon-whistleblower-releases-second-paper-alleging-large-scale</ref>  "We used [[biological]] evidence and in-depth analyses to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a laboratory product, which was created by using a template virus (ZC45/ZXC21) owned by military research laboratories under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government," reads the paper.
 +
{{quotebox|SARS-CoV2 is a product of laboratory modification, which can be created in approximately six months using a template [[virus]] owned by a laboratory of the [[People's Liberation Army]] (PLA). The fact that data fabrications were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV 2 further implicates that the laboratory modification here is beyond simple gain-of-function research.
 +
 
 +
The scale and the coordinated nature of this scientific fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research and public health. As a result of such corruption, damages have been made both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the global community.}}
 +
 
 +
The report also claims that the RaTG13 virus which Wuhan "Batwoman" Dr. Zhengli Shi and colleagues say they obtained in bat feces in 2013 (and which is 96% identical to SARS-CoV-2), is fraudulent and also man made.
 +
 
 +
Since its publication, the RaTG13 virus has served as the founding evidence for the theory that SARS-CoV-2 must have a natural origin. However, no live virus or an intact genome of RaTG13 have ever been isolated or recovered. Therefore, the only proof for the “existence” of RaTG13 in nature is its genomic sequence published on GenBank.
    
==References==
 
==References==
Block, Siteadmin, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, delete, edit, move, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, protect, rollback, Administrators, template
292,452

edits

Navigation menu