Difference between revisions of "Talk:Vestigial structures"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
GodWarrior (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
Overall the changes are good, but the removal of the point on natural selection is puzzling. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:14, 23 May 2007 (EDT) | Overall the changes are good, but the removal of the point on natural selection is puzzling. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 18:14, 23 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Sorry, I just felt it wasn't very encyclopedic the way it was worded especially the part in the form of the question. Also, it seems consistant with the Natural Selection that vestigial structures could be "in the process" of being phased out. [[User:GodWarrior|GodWarrior]] 18:26, 23 May 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 22:26, May 23, 2007
Article deletion by user:Conservative in 3....2...1.... --Gulik2 14:26, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
- Get a lot of citations, and quick. He can't delete an article with 15 citations. --Hojimachongtalk 14:26, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
- Lol:) This should be under developmental Biology and Evolution Categories. Go to pubmed and you can find plenty of articles that deal with this topic, hard evidence.--TimS 14:40, 10 May 2007 (EDT)
I just made the article sound a little more encyclopedic and added a reference. GodWarrior 16:23, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Overall the changes are good, but the removal of the point on natural selection is puzzling. Learn together 18:14, 23 May 2007 (EDT)
Sorry, I just felt it wasn't very encyclopedic the way it was worded especially the part in the form of the question. Also, it seems consistant with the Natural Selection that vestigial structures could be "in the process" of being phased out. GodWarrior 18:26, 23 May 2007 (EDT)