Difference between revisions of "Conservapedia:AFD Republic of Rhodesia (as of 1980)"
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
:: As an actual Rhodesian, I can tell you this page is all utter nonsense; please delete it. --[[User:IScott|IScott]] ([[User talk:IScott|talk]]) 20:04, September 22, 2021 (EDT) | :: As an actual Rhodesian, I can tell you this page is all utter nonsense; please delete it. --[[User:IScott|IScott]] ([[User talk:IScott|talk]]) 20:04, September 22, 2021 (EDT) | ||
| − | As every government in exile, ours has its issues with haters, aging “actual Rhodesians” who have sort of | + | As every government in exile, ours has its issues with haters, aging “actual Rhodesians” who have sort of an exclusivity syndrome, traumatized veterans, “woke” warrior’s who are into credibility assassination - and in the case of Rhodesia the fact that most gave Lancaster House a chance and did not dare to trust a fresh start. This is why the original article about UDI-Rhodesia which became Zimbabwe was not profoundly changed. These are separate entities. The 1980 proclaimed second republic had also a good reason to be silent for exactly forty years. Everyone capable of reading will find the information that the 1980 (second) republic had to stay away from the political stage for four decades because of agreements with major political players. You are of course free to delete this page, but this would mean doing the business of the leftist haters who do all they can to delegitimize today’s Rhodesia. And as to the “actual Rhodesians”: UDI-Rhodesia disappeared in 1979/1980. So today an “actual Rhodesian” is a person of Rhodesian background (or his or her parents) who has declared allegiance to the second republic, the other ones have become Zimbabweans (sorry guys…). What is more, since when do we trust Soros-Google and leftist media? Suddenly credible sources? Rhodesians should be glad that the heritage is in orderly hands which, by the way, can be contacted. The government in exile and its offices can be called without any problem. Cheers [[User:Rhodesia|Rhodesia]] ([[User talk:Rhodesia|talk]]) 16:40, September 23, 2021 (EDT) |
Revision as of 20:54, September 23, 2021
This must be a hoax, For the annexation of Bouvet Island, Google returns only 21 results including this article. After removing Twitter, Facebook and duplicates, the only two remaining relevant results were only created a few months ago. The only author of the article describes himself as the Press Office of the government of the Republic of Rhodesia. On one of those sites there is a button "What others write about Rhodesia" with a direct link to the article on this site, on the other one the button is named "Click here to learn what really happened since 1980". Blavek (talk) 14:35, September 9, 2021 (EDT)
As every government in exile, ours has its issues with haters, aging “actual Rhodesians” who have sort of an exclusivity syndrome, traumatized veterans, “woke” warrior’s who are into credibility assassination - and in the case of Rhodesia the fact that most gave Lancaster House a chance and did not dare to trust a fresh start. This is why the original article about UDI-Rhodesia which became Zimbabwe was not profoundly changed. These are separate entities. The 1980 proclaimed second republic had also a good reason to be silent for exactly forty years. Everyone capable of reading will find the information that the 1980 (second) republic had to stay away from the political stage for four decades because of agreements with major political players. You are of course free to delete this page, but this would mean doing the business of the leftist haters who do all they can to delegitimize today’s Rhodesia. And as to the “actual Rhodesians”: UDI-Rhodesia disappeared in 1979/1980. So today an “actual Rhodesian” is a person of Rhodesian background (or his or her parents) who has declared allegiance to the second republic, the other ones have become Zimbabweans (sorry guys…). What is more, since when do we trust Soros-Google and leftist media? Suddenly credible sources? Rhodesians should be glad that the heritage is in orderly hands which, by the way, can be contacted. The government in exile and its offices can be called without any problem. Cheers Rhodesia (talk) 16:40, September 23, 2021 (EDT)
