User talk:IScott

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This is my talk page

Welcome. I am also a Red Sox fan and Old Earth creationist. --Ed Poor Talk 21:13, 14 March 2009 (EDT)


Please lower it, and try hard not to respond to posts that are old. Thanks! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 22:58, 7 June 2009 (EDT)

Thats a bit of name calling! Haha! Would you mind telling me what article that was. I will see to do that in the future.--IScott 20:33, 8 June 2009 (EDT)
Name calling? Just now saw this response. I issued you an instruction. Judging from your edits since last month, you haven't yet bothered to read our style manual or Guidelines yet. Take some time and think about it. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 07:35, 7 July 2009 (EDT)


Please do not add "Saint" to a person's name--it's not standard. RJJensen 01:14, 7 July 2009 (EDT)

Who Says?

When you add citations after seeing the Who says? template, please remove the tag. Thanks. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:34, 10 July 2009 (EDT)

Bon Voyage!

Safe journey! And yes, as we say in my family, traveling with kids is bound to make things "interesting"! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 14:50, 3 August 2009 (EDT)

Thank you TK! Haha, yes travelling wih kids always makes things very "interesting"!!--IScott 14:53, 3 August 2009 (EDT)

Removing Material added by Admins

I see you recently removed material added to Natural-born citizen by RJJensen. While I could not be more sympathetic to your motivations, it is prudent to inquire about material that was added by admins before removing it. JacobB 18:16, 24 November 2009 (EST)


It is not necessary, nor desired, that every other word be "liberal", and not all results are due to something liberals do, Scott. It starts to smack of parody doing that. --ṬK/Admin/Talk 21:03, 6 July 2010 (EDT)

Completely understandable, I admit I was venting and certaintly overdid it. However that information was true and I will cite more sources and tone it down.Thank you--IScott 21:06, 6 July 2010 (EDT)
Thanks, please do! --ṬK/Admin/Talk 21:12, 6 July 2010 (EDT)


We would appreciate your input at Conservapedia:Community_Portal#Proposal. Thanks. RobSFree Kyle! 19:59, 1 February 2021 (EST)

Trump Reverts

Hey Iscott! Quick question, why did you revert the edits? - TrumpLover84

You removed material on the Biden Junta from the Trump page and material from the Obama page on his religion -- if you are actually a good faith editor, you should discuss such removals on the talk page first.--IScott (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2021 (EDT)
He's bucking for blocking rights. That's how get them - reverting your own sock trolls. RobSFree Kyle! 18:18, 4 April 2021 (EDT)
Rob, kindly mind your own business. I know I should probably ignore you as you have a penchant provoking people, but I do not appreciate being accused of creating sock accounts or trolling.--IScott (talk) 18:24, 4 April 2021 (EDT)
I admit I was wrong for removing material on the Obama page, I didn't realize that the information I changed was false on my end, but I still think almost all the material I added on Trump was correct. The only reason I took out Biden Junta was because it wasn't his name and his dictatorship was already described in extensive detail if you actually clicked the link. I was only trying to prevent confusion. Even if you still think his name is Biden Junta (A name with a title that appears on pretty much no other outlet I could find), I still think you should keep some of my edits describing his leadership and accomplishments. - TrumpLover84
I'm glad you understand regarding the Obama edits, I admit I did not see your other edits further down on the Trump page which were fine. In the future, if you are going to take out material from a busy page it should be discussed first -- there was previously a discussion over what to refer to Trump's successor. I have no desire to get into an edit war, and another user has already reverted the Trump page to your last edit. --IScott (talk) 18:52, 4 April 2021 (EDT)