Difference between revisions of "Talk:Essay:1905 Supreme Court Ruling Used to Justify Forced Vax"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do w...") |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Question: Are Nazi doctors and eugenics good company for those to keep who are demanding the Covid-19 vax? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Guilt by association]] | ||
| + | |||
The [[genetic fallacy]] is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something. The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance. An example is arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by pagans. | The [[genetic fallacy]] is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something. The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance. An example is arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by pagans. | ||
Revision as of 01:24, October 19, 2021
Question: Are Nazi doctors and eugenics good company for those to keep who are demanding the Covid-19 vax?
The genetic fallacy is a logical fallacy wherein an argument is based on the circumstances of something's origin or history when that origin or history has nothing to do with the present value of that something. The fallacy is thus a fallacy of relevance. An example is arguing that Christians should not decorate Christmas trees because thousands of years ago such practices were performed by pagans.
