Difference between revisions of "28 USC 455"
(not a recusal case) |
|||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009) | Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009) | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
United States v. Cerceda, 172 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1999) | United States v. Cerceda, 172 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1999) | ||
Revision as of 16:56, September 18, 2022
28 U.S.C. 455 is the primary recusal statute for federal judges, which contains important exceptions.
Relevant cases
Doddy v. Oxy USA, 101 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 1996)
Fowler v. Butts, 829 F.3d 788 (7th Cir. 2016)
Hedden v. Richard, 149 U.S. 346 (1893)
In re Allied Signal, 891 F.2d 974 (1st Cir. 1989)
In re Continental Airlines Corp., 901 F.2d 1259 (5th Cir. 1990)
In re Literary Works in Elec. Databases Copyright Litig., 509 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 2007)
In re Sch. Asbestos Litig., 977 F.2d 764 (3d Cir. 1992)
Kotteakos v. United States, 328 U.S. 750 (1946)
Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847 (1988)
Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994)
Muchnick v. Thomson Corp., 509 F.3d 136 (2d Cir. 2007)
Parker v. Connors Steel, 855 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1988)
Patterson v. Mobil Oil, 335 F.3d 476 (5th Cir. 2003)
Pub. Utils. Comm’n of D.C. v. Pollak, 343 U.S. 451 (1952)
Shell Oil v. United States, 672 F.3d 1283 (Fed. Cir. 2012)
Shinseki v. Sanders, 556 U.S. 396 (2009)
United States v. Cerceda, 172 F.3d 806 (11th Cir. 1999)
United States v. Williams, 949 F.3d 1056 (7th Cir. 2020)