Difference between revisions of "Essay: Is there anything more fragile than an economy run by communists - especially one that has the cult of personality surrounding Xi Jinping?"
From Conservapedia
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
Authoritarian regimes, like China, are strong (Various means to repress population and/or to limit other political options), but at the same time they are brittle. The former [[Soviet Union]] is an example of this principle. | Authoritarian regimes, like China, are strong (Various means to repress population and/or to limit other political options), but at the same time they are brittle. The former [[Soviet Union]] is an example of this principle. | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Capitalism works and is the best system == | ||
| + | |||
| + | *[https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLbjmSS6LZDGounra1oTDTIHXlodKALZCb Capitalism works and is the best system] | ||
Revision as of 16:51, June 16, 2024
"The underpinnings of China’s growth seem fragile from historical and analytical perspectives. Even if no crises materialize, unfavorable demographics, high debt levels, and an inefficient financial system will constrain China’s growth."[1]
Is there anything more fragile than an economy run by communists - especially one that has the cult of personality surrounding Xi Jinping?
Is there anything more fragile than an economy run by communists - especially one that has the cult of personality surrounding Xi Jinping?
Authoritarian regimes, like China, are strong (Various means to repress population and/or to limit other political options), but at the same time they are brittle. The former Soviet Union is an example of this principle.
