nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW
13,254
edits
Changes
→YEC v. OEC: accuracy vs. trustworthiness
::Wait, so if Genesis isn't giving us a literal timescale, then Jesus wasn't here to save us? I'm going to hold off on my criticism of that statement until I know that I interpreted your statement correctly. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 14:17, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
::Wait, so if Genesis isn't giving us a literal timescale, then Jesus wasn't here to save us? I'm going to hold off on my criticism of that statement until I know that I interpreted your statement correctly. [[User:Jazzman831|Jazzman831]] 14:17, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
:::: No, that is not the case. What TerryH said was that if Genesis is ''incorrect'' on the timescale, then it would not be ''trustworthy'' on other things. He didn't say that it wouldn't be ''correct'' on other things. That is, if a person says some false things, it doesn't mean that everything they say is false. But if you know some of what they say is false, why should you take their word on other things that you don't know the accuracy of? [[User:Philip J. Rayment|Philip J. Rayment]] 20:53, 6 July 2007 (EDT)
:::Criticize all you want--but if the [[Bible]] is found in definite error on any one point, then it ceases to be trustworthy on any other point.
:::Criticize all you want--but if the [[Bible]] is found in definite error on any one point, then it ceases to be trustworthy on any other point.