Changes

Line 54: Line 54:  
===Take a look at the false premises [[User:Conservative]] inputs in AI===
 
===Take a look at the false premises [[User:Conservative]] inputs in AI===
 
RobSmith never 'praised' Deepseek. RobSmith is not any kind of an expert to compare one AI system with another, nor has he ever used Deepseek. RobSmith simply added a link from the [[US Department of Defense]] to refute [[User:Conservative]]'s [[racist]] & [[deceptive]] Essay that [[China]] was incapable of [[innovation]].  [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Communist_China%E2%80%99s_quixotic_quest_to_innovate:_A_statist_economy_can%E2%80%99t_make_creativity_greatly_blossom See talk]
 
RobSmith never 'praised' Deepseek. RobSmith is not any kind of an expert to compare one AI system with another, nor has he ever used Deepseek. RobSmith simply added a link from the [[US Department of Defense]] to refute [[User:Conservative]]'s [[racist]] & [[deceptive]] Essay that [[China]] was incapable of [[innovation]].  [https://www.conservapedia.com/Essay:_Communist_China%E2%80%99s_quixotic_quest_to_innovate:_A_statist_economy_can%E2%80%99t_make_creativity_greatly_blossom See talk]
 +
:Someone has a reading comprehension problem.  The article in question is [[Essay: Communist China’s quixotic quest to innovate: A statist economy can’t make creativity greatly blossom]].  The articles focuses on "A statist economy can't make creativity greatly blossum". To my knowledge the Taiwanese Chinese are very much making creativity greatly blossum. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] ([[User talk:Conservative|talk]]) 13:57, October 21, 2026 (EDT)
    
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==
 
==Blanked pages and Karajou's bird content==
Irenaeus, Siteadmin, Check users, oversight, Administrators
351,736

edits