Difference between revisions of "Talk:Liberal hypocrisy"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: == This should be merged == Shouldn't this article really just be titled "hypocrisy" with a note that liberals often engage in this type of behavior? It could be its own category - blend...)
 
(it's a special case)
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
Shouldn't this article really just be titled "hypocrisy" with a note that liberals often engage in this type of behavior?  It could be its own category - blended together with [[deceit]], the [[occult]], etc.  --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:07, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 
Shouldn't this article really just be titled "hypocrisy" with a note that liberals often engage in this type of behavior?  It could be its own category - blended together with [[deceit]], the [[occult]], etc.  --[[User:LiteratiChamp|LiteratiChamp]] 19:07, 20 July 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
:Too early for that. Let the articles develop separately first; we can always generalize later. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 19:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

Revision as of 23:22, July 20, 2007

This should be merged

Shouldn't this article really just be titled "hypocrisy" with a note that liberals often engage in this type of behavior? It could be its own category - blended together with deceit, the occult, etc. --LiteratiChamp 19:07, 20 July 2007 (EDT)

Too early for that. Let the articles develop separately first; we can always generalize later. --Ed Poor Talk 19:22, 20 July 2007 (EDT)