Difference between revisions of "Talk:Pro-life"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The claim that the Democratic party wishes to have no legal restrictions placed on abortion is just plain wrong. [[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 18:17, 30 September 2007 (EDT) | The claim that the Democratic party wishes to have no legal restrictions placed on abortion is just plain wrong. [[User:Alloco1|Alloco1]] 18:17, 30 September 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No mention of abortion clinic bombings/car-into-smashings? [[User:Barikada|Barikada]] 23:23, 26 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:23, January 27, 2008
Maybe it should be noted that some so-called "pro-lifers" kill doctors. Very in favour of life, these pro-lifers.
Could someone please explain why the reason for the term "pro-life" is "liberal bias"? Especially when said reason (life begins at conception) is surely in accordiace with Conservapedia thinking? G7mzh 11:39, 14 August 2007 (EDT)
The claim that the Democratic party wishes to have no legal restrictions placed on abortion is just plain wrong. Alloco1 18:17, 30 September 2007 (EDT)
No mention of abortion clinic bombings/car-into-smashings? Barikada 23:23, 26 January 2008 (EST)