Difference between revisions of "Talk:Massachusetts liberal"
From Conservapedia
(over - specific) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) (Do we really need this article) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0923080.html], one of the lowest crime rates. [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/macrime.htm], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm], one of the lowest murder rates [http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=169&scid=12] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST) | So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0923080.html], one of the lowest crime rates. [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/macrime.htm], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/], [http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm], one of the lowest murder rates [http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/article.php?did=169&scid=12] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? [[User:JoshuaZ|JoshuaZ]] 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST) | ||
::This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. [[User:DDG|DDG]] 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ::This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. [[User:DDG|DDG]] 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Do we really need this article == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative | ||
Revision as of 02:06, March 20, 2007
So, would it be at all relevant that Massachusetts has the lowest divorce rate[1], one of the lowest crime rates. [2], [3], [4], one of the lowest murder rates [5] and (I don't have a citation at the moement) one of the lowest adultery rates? JoshuaZ 02:56, 4 March 2007 (EST)
- This is indeed overspecific on some of their errors. DDG 23:49, 12 March 2007 (EDT)
Do we really need this article
I am very conservative but I don't see a need for this article. Why not simply include it in the MA article. Conservative 22:06, 19 March 2007 (EDT)conservative
