Difference between revisions of "User talk:DeanS"

From Conservapedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Reverted edits by Boru (Talk); changed back to last version by Conservative)
(Contest....)
Line 93: Line 93:
  
 
I know you are very active in posting breaking news.  I think if Conservapedia had an decent article on [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsBusters]] that were designed to get to the top of the search engines we could attract a lot of the readers of WorldNetDaily and NewsBusters when they Googled those websites to click on them.  Do you have any interest in this?  I could tell you what a "internet search engine master" told me in a few quick sentences so the article would be ranked highly by the search engines in all likelihood. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:22, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
 
I know you are very active in posting breaking news.  I think if Conservapedia had an decent article on [[WorldNetDaily]] and [[NewsBusters]] that were designed to get to the top of the search engines we could attract a lot of the readers of WorldNetDaily and NewsBusters when they Googled those websites to click on them.  Do you have any interest in this?  I could tell you what a "internet search engine master" told me in a few quick sentences so the article would be ranked highly by the search engines in all likelihood. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 02:22, 23 October 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Contest.... ==
 +
 +
Do you want me to add you back in, or do you have a team perference?  --<font color="#1E90FF" face="Comic Sans MS">[[User:TK|şyŝoρ-₮K]]</font><sup><font color="DC143C">[[User_Talk:TK|/Ṣρёаќǃ]]</font></sup> 15:22, 9 November 2007 (EST)

Revision as of 20:22, November 9, 2007

IF YOU NEED IMMEDIATE HELP AND I AM NOT HERE PLEASE GO HERE FOR A LIST OF Administrators/Sysops: Sysop list

No Ping-ponging Conversations! Archive Policy
Conversations are easier to read if they stay on one page. If I leave a message on your talk page, please respond there; I'm watching it. If you start a conversation here, I'll reply here, so please watch this page. Conversations which have not had additions in 14 days may be archived. Or just deleted and recreation prohibited. My "castle", my rules. A 'conversation' is a group of messages delimited by a heading. Hopefully this will allow conversations to stay in one place long enough for people who are interested to read the whole thing, without leading to an overly long page. Make sure you sign your posts, please.

Archive1


Conservative links

Thank you for your comment. Please do whatever you think that could improve the article. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:02, 2 September 2007 (EDT)

Andy wants us to make explanation for the links set in this article. Could you help? Thanks! --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 07:45, 21 September 2007 (EDT)

Contest

Would you be interested in going after another victory and joining team one (to be named) in the contest? --Tash 19:04, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for the invite Tash. I would like to join your team with the understanding I'm now working 7 days a week and will have limited time to contribute to the contest. I don't want your team to lose because of me. ;-) --Crocoite 19:19, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

No problem, I have SAT's in two weeks... so I;m going to be busy as well... you're in!--Tash 19:23, 22 September 2007 (EDT)

Help

Could you please unblock. I can't find the way.

08:34, 23 September 2007 Joaquín Martínez (Talk | contribs | block) blocked "ConservativeMom (contribs)" with an expiry time of infinite (name) Retrieved from "http://www.conservapedia.com/Special:Blockip" --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 08:58, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

Try this Special:Ipblocklist. Then unblock.
I can still do the unblock for you Joaquín if you're still having problems. --Crocoite 09:03, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
Done. Thank you my friend. --User:Joaquín Martínez, talk 09:11, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

Why the reverts?

The first Conservapedia Commandment states that you shouldn't copy (although public domain sources seem to be excluded from this for some reason) unless it was your own work.

Considering that the articles you created are complete copies of a copyrighted page, I now ask for proof that you are the original author of that page. --Jenkins 10:43, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

Jenkins, these articles were not copied from the source you described; however, I am going to delete them until I find the appropriate government reference. --Crocoite 10:52, 23 September 2007 (EDT)
Well, googling for key phrases from the articles ALL gave exactly ONE result (and the articles match the source), namely the one I mentioned. That's usually a very good indicator. However, I will assume good faith and drop the issue until you find a public domain source or word the articles in a way that doesn't coincide with a copyrighted one. --Jenkins 10:56, 23 September 2007 (EDT)

Copying from government sites

Crocoite, copying from federal government sites almost never has a copyright problem, but some state governments do assert a copyright. So please check carefully with the website before copying from a state government site. Thanks and Godspeed.--Aschlafly 12:54, 30 September 2007 (EDT)

Thanks for the reminder Andy. --Crocoite 15:47, 30 September 2007 (EDT)

Very Nicely Done

Hey - I just noticed your huge point increase on the team page - great job! With stuff like that we'll win this contest handily :D --IDuan 21:06, 1 October 2007 (EDT)

Thanks Iduan. I'm not counting the win just yet... Andy is very formidable and he will keep us going to the last second. ;-)

I sent you a private email

I sent you a private email. Conservative 22:53, 3 October 2007 (EDT)

Great Job!

Couldn't have won without you. Thanks--Tash 15:27, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Thanks Tash. Great teamwork ;-) You and LearnTogether led the way to victory. --Crocoite 15:31, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
Just wanted to say Congratulations...although I still can't believe you won...for a little while, I thought we had it :) oh well...if you were on our team, we definitely would have won! DeborahB. 20:04, 5 October 2007 (EDT)
Thanks Deb. I was really worried, but LearnTogether was our best editor. ;-) Last time Andy was the main editor, but this time you had good teamwork and almost won. Anyway, Conservapedia was the real winner ;-) --Crocoite 20:10, 5 October 2007 (EDT)

Lesbian

Don`t you think an article about this subject is necessary. It could be protected if you consider it adequate.

I agree and the article would need to be protected. --Crocoite 17:27, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
Nothing special about Lesbians; they are merely female homosexualss. --Ed Poor Talk 17:30, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
The redirect and link to the homosexual article is fine. Thanks Ed. --Crocoite 17:43, 13 October 2007 (EDT)
  1. 20:46, 15 May 2007 ColinR (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Lesbian" (content was: '#redirect Lesbos{{delete}}')
  2. 14:17, 15 March 2007 Aschlafly (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Lesbian"
  3. 19:46, 13 March 2007 MountainDew (Talk | contribs | block) deleted "Lesbian"
  • I have no idea where this was being talked about, and who all was involved aside from Ed, Joaquin and you, but the above should be a clear enough indication to all of you. If you don't like it, start checking with others before you act! "Others" means me, and the rest of the Site Admins. --şŷŝôρ-₮K/Ṣρёаќǃ 19:13, 13 October 2007 (EDT)

quick question

I know you are very active in posting breaking news. I think if Conservapedia had an decent article on WorldNetDaily and NewsBusters that were designed to get to the top of the search engines we could attract a lot of the readers of WorldNetDaily and NewsBusters when they Googled those websites to click on them. Do you have any interest in this? I could tell you what a "internet search engine master" told me in a few quick sentences so the article would be ranked highly by the search engines in all likelihood. Conservative 02:22, 23 October 2007 (EDT)

Contest....

Do you want me to add you back in, or do you have a team perference? --şyŝoρ-₮K/Ṣρёаќǃ 15:22, 9 November 2007 (EST)