Difference between revisions of "Sufficient condition"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m (undead end)
Line 3: Line 3:
 
For example, "I heard [[thunder]]" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been [[lightning]] nearby to cause it.
 
For example, "I heard [[thunder]]" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there ''must'' have been [[lightning]] nearby to cause it.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
 
However, "There was lightning nearby" is ''not'' a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.
 +
 +
 +
From the affirmation of a sufficient condition, one may infer that the [[necessary condition]] is true.
  
 
[[Category:Logic]]
 
[[Category:Logic]]

Revision as of 11:02, October 26, 2013

A sufficient condition is one for which the following is true:

If A is a sufficient condition of B, then if A is true, B must be true.

For example, "I heard thunder" is a sufficient condition of "There was lightning nearby," because if I heard thunder, there must have been lightning nearby to cause it. However, "There was lightning nearby" is not a sufficient cause of "I heard thunder," because there may have been lightning nearby that I did not hear.


From the affirmation of a sufficient condition, one may infer that the necessary condition is true.