Siteadmin, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
125,790
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − +
Essay:Gun Control Case (view source)
Revision as of 23:12, November 20, 2007
, 23:12, November 20, 2007→Question Presented: fixed link
== Question Presented ==
== Question Presented ==
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]]'s unusual rewriting of the question in its [[cert. granted]] in the big control case reveals that it is leaning in favor of a governmental power to impose [[gun control]]:
The [[U.S. Supreme Court]]'s unusual rewriting of the question in its granting of [[certiorari]] in the big control case reveals that it is leaning in favor of a governmental power to impose [[gun control]]:
"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"
"Whether the following provisions — D.C. Code secs. 7-2502.02(a)(4), 22-4504(a), and 7-2507.02 — violate the Second Amendment rights of individuals who are not affiliated with any state-regulated militia, but who wish to keep handguns and other firearms for private use in their homes?"