Difference between revisions of "Null hypothesis"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(one less "most-wanted" entry)
 
m (De-deadend)
Line 1: Line 1:
The '''null hypothesis''' is the hypothesis that a factor or characteristic of a group is of no consequence.  In other words, the '''null hypothesis''' is that a factor does not matter.
+
The '''null hypothesis''' is the [[hypothesis]] that a factor or characteristic of a group is of no consequence.  In other words, the null hypothesis is that a factor does not matter.
  
Many science experiments seek to disprove the '''null hypothesis''' as the first step towards proving that a meaningful (alternative) scientific hypothesis is true.  Most medical studies, for example, that seek to prove the efficacy of a drug must first rule out the '''null hypothesis''' that taking the drug makes no difference.
+
Many science experiments seek to disprove the null hypothesis as the first step towards proving that a meaningful (alternative) scientific hypothesis is true.  Most medical studies, for example, that seek to prove the efficacy of a drug must first rule out the null hypothesis that taking the drug makes no difference.
 
[[category:statistics]]
 
[[category:statistics]]
 
[[category:medicine]]
 
[[category:medicine]]
 
[[category:science]]
 
[[category:science]]

Revision as of 17:22, December 9, 2007

The null hypothesis is the hypothesis that a factor or characteristic of a group is of no consequence. In other words, the null hypothesis is that a factor does not matter.

Many science experiments seek to disprove the null hypothesis as the first step towards proving that a meaningful (alternative) scientific hypothesis is true. Most medical studies, for example, that seek to prove the efficacy of a drug must first rule out the null hypothesis that taking the drug makes no difference.