Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neoconservative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(reply) |
(fine with me!) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
::Okay, I wanted to add National Review to the list of neoconservative publications, but thought I'd run it by you first. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ::Okay, I wanted to add National Review to the list of neoconservative publications, but thought I'd run it by you first. [[User:DanH|DanH]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::: That's fine with me!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 04:45, December 24, 2007
What about William Buckley, et. al? DanH 23:32, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Buckley started out as a conservative decades ago, but he allowed his publication National Review to become neoconservative. Buckley himself has not been a factor in the conservative movement for at least the last 20 years.--Aschlafly 23:41, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Okay, I wanted to add National Review to the list of neoconservative publications, but thought I'd run it by you first. DanH 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- That's fine with me!--Aschlafly 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)