Difference between revisions of "Talk:Neoconservative"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(fine with me!) |
(Hmm…) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: That's fine with me!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ::: That's fine with me!--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Hmm… == | ||
| + | |||
| + | Isn't the standard definition of "neoconservative" something along the lines of "an individual with a political alignment that advocates strong foreign policy and capitalism"? I know because neo-Nazis aren't very fond of them, being xenophobes. --[[User:SimonA|SimonA]] 21:47, 26 December 2007 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 02:47, December 27, 2007
What about William Buckley, et. al? DanH 23:32, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Buckley started out as a conservative decades ago, but he allowed his publication National Review to become neoconservative. Buckley himself has not been a factor in the conservative movement for at least the last 20 years.--Aschlafly 23:41, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- Okay, I wanted to add National Review to the list of neoconservative publications, but thought I'd run it by you first. DanH 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)
- That's fine with me!--Aschlafly 23:45, 23 December 2007 (EST)
Hmm…
Isn't the standard definition of "neoconservative" something along the lines of "an individual with a political alignment that advocates strong foreign policy and capitalism"? I know because neo-Nazis aren't very fond of them, being xenophobes. --SimonA 21:47, 26 December 2007 (EST)