Difference between revisions of "Talk:Londonderry"
From Conservapedia
IrishBeryl (Talk | contribs) |
IrishBeryl (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST) | why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? [[User:Rodney|Rodney]] 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST) | ||
| − | Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? [[User:IrishBeryl|IrishBeryl]] 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST) | + | <br />Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? [[User:IrishBeryl|IrishBeryl]] 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST) |
Revision as of 20:53, February 16, 2008
Merge with Derry?
Surely must be done - but I hesitate to select the most appropriate name! IrishBeryl 16:57, 15 February 2008 (EST)
- article title 'Derry/Londonderry' should do it. Sawneybeane 07:27, 16 February 2008 (EST)
why undo the merge/ go with the Unionist default? Rodney 15:52, 16 February 2008 (EST)
Yes, why succumb to unionist propaganda and appear one-sided? IrishBeryl 15:53, 16 February 2008 (EST)
