Difference between revisions of "Talk:Abortionist"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:: I understand that.  But it has not always been so.  Abortion has a long history and the procedure has not always been in the hands of trained (and paid) medical professionals.  --[[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 20:28, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 
:: I understand that.  But it has not always been so.  Abortion has a long history and the procedure has not always been in the hands of trained (and paid) medical professionals.  --[[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 20:28, 23 February 2008 (EST)
  
−
::: We're describing [[abortion]] today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it.
+
::: We're describing [[abortion]] today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it. {{unsigned|Aschlafly}}
  
 
:::: Unless we want produce an accurate article. Furthermore, the fact that a person gets paid is irrelevant.  Are you suggesting that every job described here should include the phrase "and profits from"?  --[[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 20:32, 23 February 2008 (EST)
 
:::: Unless we want produce an accurate article. Furthermore, the fact that a person gets paid is irrelevant.  Are you suggesting that every job described here should include the phrase "and profits from"?  --[[User:HMayo|HMayo]] 20:32, 23 February 2008 (EST)

Revision as of 01:36, February 24, 2008

Let's just pause for a minute

Shall we have a discussion rather than an edit war? --HMayo 20:14, 23 February 2008 (EST)

It is inaccurate to say that an abortionist is someone who necessarily profits from abortion. It might well usually be so but it not necessarily so. --HMayo 20:18, 23 February 2008 (EST)

It's factual. Abortion is a profitable business, and there are no volunteer abortionists.--Aschlafly 20:22, 23 February 2008 (EST)
I understand that. But it has not always been so. Abortion has a long history and the procedure has not always been in the hands of trained (and paid) medical professionals. --HMayo 20:28, 23 February 2008 (EST)
We're describing abortion today, and I don't agree with you about its history but there is no reason to waste time on it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Aschlafly (talk)
Unless we want produce an accurate article. Furthermore, the fact that a person gets paid is irrelevant. Are you suggesting that every job described here should include the phrase "and profits from"? --HMayo 20:32, 23 February 2008 (EST)