Difference between revisions of "Embraced deceit"
From Conservapedia
(per request on talk page, a description) |
(reference needed - not a link to a prejudiced list) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also. | '''Embraced deceit''' is [[deceit]] that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the [[deceit]] promote it, but his allies were complicit also. | ||
| − | '''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]]. | + | '''Embraced deceit''' is common among [[liberals]], but non-existent among [[conservatives]].{{fact}} |
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 20:27, March 8, 2008
Embraced deceit is deceit that is knowingly allowed, defended or even promoted for ideological purposes. Not only did the perpetrator of the deceit promote it, but his allies were complicit also.
Embraced deceit is common among liberals, but non-existent among conservatives.[Citation Needed]
