203
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 187:
Line 187: + +
Talk:Left Behind: Eternal Forces (view source)
Revision as of 19:46, March 11, 2008
, 19:46, March 11, 2008→Complaints vs. patches
::I should add - I think your accusation of 'my opinion being used to defend the use of ''some''' is particularly ironic, given that it appears very clear that you have been trying to impose your opinion that this game is absolutely excellent and cannot have any valid complaints levelled against it on this article. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:27, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
::I should add - I think your accusation of 'my opinion being used to defend the use of ''some''' is particularly ironic, given that it appears very clear that you have been trying to impose your opinion that this game is absolutely excellent and cannot have any valid complaints levelled against it on this article. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:27, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
:::Oh, please. "Fully patched" means "fully patched." You are applying unprovable standards to that phrase which cannot be verified. Continue to try to push your disproven agenda and you actions will be reported. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:36, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
:::Oh, please. "Fully patched" means "fully patched." You are applying unprovable standards to that phrase which cannot be verified. Continue to try to push your disproven agenda and you actions will be reported. [[User:Jinxmchue|Jinxmchue]] 15:36, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
::::Do a Google search for 'fully patched'. You'll get hits like [http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=254 this], [http://sunbeltblog.blogspot.com/2005/12/new-exploit-blows-by-fully-patched.html this], [http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2004/06/09/new_attack_compromises_fullypatched_ie_browsers.html this], [http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/06/05/0046258 this], [http://securitywatch.eweek.com/microsoft_windows/driveby_exploit_plants_trojans_on_fully_patched_iewindows_systems.html this], [http://www.geek.com/fully-patched-firefox-browser-has-extensions-vulnerability/ this], [http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/6230 this], [http://www.2-spyware.com/news/post243.html this], [http://digg.com/tech_news/New_exploit_blows_by_fully_patched_Windows_XP_systems this] and [http://virtualization.sys-con.com/read/166894.htm this]. That's just a few samples from the first 2 or 3 pages that most effectively prove my point - which is that you are utterly and completely wrong. 'Fully patched' does not mean 'no issues left', it means 'all patches so far applied'. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:46, 11 March 2008 (EDT)