Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Reviews
Line 191: Line 191:     
::::I've done a compromise (again) - I've kept your edit, but altered it to be accurate, in light of the above, and moved your source to a more appropriate place. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:55, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 
::::I've done a compromise (again) - I've kept your edit, but altered it to be accurate, in light of the above, and moved your source to a more appropriate place. [[User:Urushnor|Urushnor]] 15:55, 11 March 2008 (EDT)
 +
 +
== Reviews ==
 +
 +
I believe this section could be better.  Aspects that are said to be poor by some reviews are said to be superior by other reviews below.  We want to make it easy for our readers to get a feel as to how the game plays.  It's best to just record information that is agreed upon.  Also, the line that indicates the product suffered from "bugs... crashes" is misleading.  Virutally all new products suffer from bugs and crashes.  The question is what makes the game different, and, of course, what is it like after its patches?
 +
 +
I would also suggest using the opportunity of the article protection to reach wording that both of you can agree with instead of reverting.  Your differences appeared to be minor, and there was no reason to force Dan to intervene and lock the article over a small difference that you should have been able to solve in other ways. [[User:Learn together|Learn together]] 21:33, 13 March 2008 (EDT)
nsTeam1RO, nsTeam1RW, nsTeam1_talkRO, nsTeam1_talkRW
13,818

edits

Navigation menu