Difference between revisions of "Seduction of Eve"

From Conservapedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(New page: The '''seduction of Eve''' is seen as sexual by two religious movements: Christian Identity in the US and the Unification Church, which orginated in Korea.)
 
(an unusual interpretation)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
The '''seduction of Eve''' is seen as sexual by two religious movements: [[Christian Identity]] in the US and the [[Unification Church]], which orginated in Korea.
 
The '''seduction of Eve''' is seen as sexual by two religious movements: [[Christian Identity]] in the US and the [[Unification Church]], which orginated in Korea.
 +
 +
Some Bible interpreters regard Genesis as suggesting that angels had sex with earthly women:
 +
 +
{{quotebox|"The sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose" (Gen.6:2). [http://www.triumphpro.com/cain_and_abel_and_the_seduction_of_eve.htm]}}
 +
 +
This interpretation assumes that "sons of God" refers to [[angel]]s, while "daughters of men" refers to human females.

Revision as of 11:21, March 12, 2008

The seduction of Eve is seen as sexual by two religious movements: Christian Identity in the US and the Unification Church, which orginated in Korea.

Some Bible interpreters regard Genesis as suggesting that angels had sex with earthly women:

"The sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose" (Gen.6:2). [1]

This interpretation assumes that "sons of God" refers to angels, while "daughters of men" refers to human females.