Difference between revisions of "User talk:Claypool"
From Conservapedia
(Claypool, you didn't heed the advice above from 18 months ago. You're still all talk and no substantive contributions. Is that pattern going to change?) |
|||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Hello Claypool, It will be nice if we all could get along in this place. Please start some positive contributions instead of arguing. Thanks--[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 13:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | Hello Claypool, It will be nice if we all could get along in this place. Please start some positive contributions instead of arguing. Thanks--[[User:Heffalump|Heffalump]] 13:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Claypool, you didn't heed the advice above from 18 months ago. You're still all talk and no substantive contributions. Is that pattern going to change?--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 20:45, 8 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 01:45, November 9, 2009
Relation
Are you in any way related to a Michael or John Claypool? o_0 Fuzzy 21:08, 25 February 2008 (EST)
Positive contribution?
Hello Claypool, It will be nice if we all could get along in this place. Please start some positive contributions instead of arguing. Thanks--Heffalump 13:46, 21 April 2008 (EDT)
- Claypool, you didn't heed the advice above from 18 months ago. You're still all talk and no substantive contributions. Is that pattern going to change?--Andy Schlafly 20:45, 8 November 2009 (EST)
