Difference between revisions of "Talk:David Cameron"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Walton One (talk | contribs) (???) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have deleted some trivial gossip regarding his haircut, clarified the section on his change in policy direction and provided the relevant link to the Conservative Party's website and to polling data regarding public opinion of Cameron & the Party. Given that he is likely to be the next PM but one following Blair and Brown this article is still very short, but I don't currently have time to expand it. [[User:Tracy C Copeland|Tracy C Copeland]] 08:33, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | I have deleted some trivial gossip regarding his haircut, clarified the section on his change in policy direction and provided the relevant link to the Conservative Party's website and to polling data regarding public opinion of Cameron & the Party. Given that he is likely to be the next PM but one following Blair and Brown this article is still very short, but I don't currently have time to expand it. [[User:Tracy C Copeland|Tracy C Copeland]] 08:33, 18 March 2007 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Seeing as this is supposed to be a conservative encyclopedia, I have no idea why this article seems to be overwhelmingly biased against Cameron, while the [[Gordon Brown]] article (which lacks sources) is quite favourable towards Brown. [[User:Palace1|Palace1]] 15:41, 11 January 2008 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 20:41, January 11, 2008
I have deleted some trivial gossip regarding his haircut, clarified the section on his change in policy direction and provided the relevant link to the Conservative Party's website and to polling data regarding public opinion of Cameron & the Party. Given that he is likely to be the next PM but one following Blair and Brown this article is still very short, but I don't currently have time to expand it. Tracy C Copeland 08:33, 18 March 2007 (EDT)
Seeing as this is supposed to be a conservative encyclopedia, I have no idea why this article seems to be overwhelmingly biased against Cameron, while the Gordon Brown article (which lacks sources) is quite favourable towards Brown. Palace1 15:41, 11 January 2008 (EST)