2
edits
Changes
→Hey: new section
Now, if you could only ask Aschlafly the same about editing out relevant biographical information?--[[User:Argon|Argon]] 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
Now, if you could only ask Aschlafly the same about editing out relevant biographical information?--[[User:Argon|Argon]] 21:08, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
:I guess if he thinks it is not relevant for conservapedia, then it isn't. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 21:30, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
:I guess if he thinks it is not relevant for conservapedia, then it isn't. [[User:HenryS|HenryS]] 21:30, 30 June 2008 (EDT)
== Hey ==
It looks like you actually create content whose sole purpose is not to disparage the opposing viewpoint and advance wildly insane versions of the conservative view. Why don't you stop deluding yourself and actually join a decent collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I mean, Conservapedia, trustworthy? The inherent bias in the name makes that assertion laughably ironic.[[User:FatVirgin|FatVirgin]] 20:13, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
== Hey ==
== Hey ==
It looks like you actually create content whose sole purpose is not to disparage the opposing viewpoint and advance wildly insane versions of the conservative view. Why don't you stop deluding yourself and actually join a decent collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I mean, Conservapedia, trustworthy? The inherent bias in the name makes that assertion laughably ironic.[[User:FatVirgin|FatVirgin]] 20:13, 5 July 2008 (EDT)
It looks like you actually create content whose sole purpose is not to disparage the opposing viewpoint and advance wildly insane versions of the conservative view. Why don't you stop deluding yourself and actually join a decent collaborative encyclopedia like Wikipedia. I mean, Conservapedia, trustworthy? The inherent bias in the name makes that assertion laughably ironic.[[User:FatVirgin|FatVirgin]] 20:13, 5 July 2008 (EDT)