Difference between revisions of "Fraud"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Medieval perspective.) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
# the victim justifiably relied on the false statement | # the victim justifiably relied on the false statement | ||
# the victim was [[damage]]d | # the victim was [[damage]]d | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Other uses== | ||
| + | In [[Medieval]] thought including [[Dante]]'s [[Divine Comedy]], fraud was a broad term used to describe any [[sin]] that involved the use of human intellect, including [[deceit]], [[magic|sorcery]], [[hypocrisy]], [[theft]] and [[forgery]] in addition to what we think of as fraud today. These sins were known as 'minor fraud'; 'major fraud' was another name for [[treachery]], which was considered to be the worst sin of all. | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Revision as of 11:13, October 10, 2008
A fraud is a false representation of a matter of fact which is intended to deceive another.
To prove fraud in court, a victim must prove each of the "five fingers of fraud":[1]
- a person made a material false statement
- he knew the statement was false
- he intended to deceive the victim
- the victim justifiably relied on the false statement
- the victim was damaged
Other uses
In Medieval thought including Dante's Divine Comedy, fraud was a broad term used to describe any sin that involved the use of human intellect, including deceit, sorcery, hypocrisy, theft and forgery in addition to what we think of as fraud today. These sins were known as 'minor fraud'; 'major fraud' was another name for treachery, which was considered to be the worst sin of all.
References
- ↑ In re Mau, 293 B.R. 919, 923 (Bankr. C.D.Ill. 2003)