Difference between revisions of "User talk:LongStop"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Whitlock's narrow range) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
*You mean, like [[Conservative]] and [[Karajou]]? [[User:LongStop|LongStop]] 17:13, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | *You mean, like [[Conservative]] and [[Karajou]]? [[User:LongStop|LongStop]] 17:13, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
| + | :Don't even try... By the way, Whitlock's paper seems to address only a narrow set of conditions - that in which the means of the two groups varied from 0 to 0.1 SD; a very small maximum difference. Looking at his last two graphs it appears that the correlation of the weighted z-method to the 'true population' p value falls off at the end, whereas Fisher's test remains stable. If you decide to come back, I'd be interested in your opinion about this.--[[User:Brossa|Brossa]] 20:47, 13 October 2008 (EDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 00:47, October 14, 2008
Use your real name if you're going to claim special expertise. Otherwise, your edits will be reverted. That should be obvious. Godspeed.--Aschlafly 22:16, 12 October 2008 (EDT)
- You mean, like Conservative and Karajou? LongStop 17:13, 13 October 2008 (EDT)
- Don't even try... By the way, Whitlock's paper seems to address only a narrow set of conditions - that in which the means of the two groups varied from 0 to 0.1 SD; a very small maximum difference. Looking at his last two graphs it appears that the correlation of the weighted z-method to the 'true population' p value falls off at the end, whereas Fisher's test remains stable. If you decide to come back, I'd be interested in your opinion about this.--Brossa 20:47, 13 October 2008 (EDT)