Difference between revisions of "Creation scientist"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(actually, creation scientists DON'T hold that fact must be scientifically verifiable.) |
(Correct article; how many courts have held this?) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to | + | A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record. |
| − | + | United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion. ''See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District,'' 400 F. Supp.2d 724. | |
| − | |||
| − | United States courts have | ||
Revision as of 13:27, March 23, 2007
A creation scientist is one who attempts to use traditional tools of science to show that the scientific evidence is consistent with the biblical record.
United States courts have held that creation science, as practiced by creation scientists, is a form of religion. See, e.g., Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District, 400 F. Supp.2d 724.