Difference between revisions of "Creation science"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(This info has no place in this article, and only hurts Creation Science instead of helping it.) |
Conservative (talk | contribs) m (Reverted edits by ColinR (Talk); changed back to last version by Conservative) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{stub}} | {{stub}} | ||
| − | An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. | + | An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[http://www.ovpr.uga.edu/researchnews/97su/faith.html] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the [[United States National Academy of Sciences]] do not believe there is a God. [http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v394/n6691/full/394313a0.html] |
Revision as of 00:04, March 26, 2007
An effort to show that scientific evidence is consistent with the account of Creation in the Bible. Creation science is not accepted by most scientists. However, a poll among United States scientists showed approximately 45% of scientists believed there was no God.[1] In addition, a survey found that 93% of the scientists who were members of the United States National Academy of Sciences do not believe there is a God. [2]