93
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 157:
Line 157: + +
Response
::::No, not cool at all, DaveB7. Your edit comment says fixing periods and caps, yet you were using [[deceit]], and removed the word [[liberal]] as well, altering the meaning of the entry. Now I will be looking over all of your edits....and if I find that is your pattern, and I suspect I will....well, you know (or should know) what I will do. The default liberal position, BTW, is to always keep a double standard, applying one to conservatives, another for their own. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:09, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
::::No, not cool at all, DaveB7. Your edit comment says fixing periods and caps, yet you were using [[deceit]], and removed the word [[liberal]] as well, altering the meaning of the entry. Now I will be looking over all of your edits....and if I find that is your pattern, and I suspect I will....well, you know (or should know) what I will do. The default liberal position, BTW, is to always keep a double standard, applying one to conservatives, another for their own. --[[User:TK|'''ṬK''']]<sub><small><small>/Admin</small></small></sub><sup>[[User_Talk:TK|/Talk]]</sup> 17:09, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
::::: :( I removed the word "liberal" because as written, it possibly suggests that the classic "when did you stop beating your wife?" question contains a liberal assumption, rather than just an assumption. The ''name of the page'' is "liberal tricks". It's not necessary for every entry that describes a trick to include the word liberal. My edit reason wasn't intentionally deceitful. I went in to standardize periods and caps, and noticed that the sentence has a bit of an awkward construction. It doesn't alter the meaning of the entry at all, it just avoids the question "what's the liberal assumption buried in 'when did you stop beating your wife?'" A little good faith, please? --[[User:DaveB7|DaveB7]] 17:45, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
::: I agree with the rhetoric used in accepting and promoting honorary degrees on a case by case basis varies based on the ideology of the person being awarded and the people who are not, but I meant that the idea behind the degrees is liberal. [[User:Marlowe|Marlowe]] 17:32, 5 July 2009 (EDT)
::: I agree with the rhetoric used in accepting and promoting honorary degrees on a case by case basis varies based on the ideology of the person being awarded and the people who are not, but I meant that the idea behind the degrees is liberal. [[User:Marlowe|Marlowe]] 17:32, 5 July 2009 (EDT)