Difference between revisions of "User talk:EvanW"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Great case description (Bailey)!) |
(thanks) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Great case description (Bailey)!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:43, 16 November 2009 (EST) | Great case description (Bailey)!--[[User:Aschlafly|Andy Schlafly]] 16:43, 16 November 2009 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Redirect== | ||
| + | |||
| + | Thanks for [[Indians]] - those are the ones [[Michael Crichton]] was talking about. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 17:37, 17 November 2009 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:37, November 17, 2009
Cat Cora
It's correct now because you changed it from her doing badly because she is gay to her marrying her partner. Plus, I don't think this person warrants inclusion. Trust me, Alphak is a vandal. ameda 23:08, 15 November 2009 (EST)
- Agreed; he probably is. But, I prefer keeping real information even if vandals add it. Notability is another matter, though - I know Wikipedia's policy, but does Conservapedia have one? It doesn't seem to be in the Commandments or Guidelines.--EvanW 23:15, 15 November 2009 (EST)
- Understand that I reverted the first edit which is exactly the type of vandalism we get here. While I am not the most knowledgeable on this site yet on the yeas or neas I have seen celebrity articles deleted, even A-listers. ameda 23:33, 15 November 2009 (EST)
- Great question; I think we need to discuss notability. I just asked Andy.
- Understand that I reverted the first edit which is exactly the type of vandalism we get here. While I am not the most knowledgeable on this site yet on the yeas or neas I have seen celebrity articles deleted, even A-listers. ameda 23:33, 15 November 2009 (EST)
Great case description
Great case description (Bailey)!--Andy Schlafly 16:43, 16 November 2009 (EST)
Redirect
Thanks for Indians - those are the ones Michael Crichton was talking about. --Ed Poor Talk 17:37, 17 November 2009 (EST)