Changes

819 bytes added ,  08:24, April 22, 2010
Line 66: Line 66:     
Conservapedia should check this entry... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 15:54, 26 December 2009 (EST)
 
Conservapedia should check this entry... [[User:FrankC|FrankC aka ComedyFan]] 15:54, 26 December 2009 (EST)
 +
 +
== Best of the public versus Expert ==
 +
 +
I just don't see how "expert" can be avoided. For just one field - In order to translate the Bible, one must know Biblical Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. These are not gained by just living, even the finest of living. One must study these languages and the literatures of these languages, and one must be knowledgeable about the language into which these languages are to be translated. This takes time, effort, specialization, dedication. The result of all of these qualities and endeavors, is a person that is a specialist, an expert. A resource for others to go to, that others must go to. I don't see any other way. There is no guarantee, I know, and experts can be wrong, biased,etc., but they are essential.[[User:BertSchlossberg|BertSchlossberg]] 04:24, 22 April 2010 (EDT)
Block, SkipCaptcha, Upload, Automoderated users, edit
3,189

edits