107
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 116:
Line 116: +
→Women's influence on science: re
::It's difficult to discuss these matters, because the last time a prominent academic tried to do so, he was set up for a fall (see [[Lawrence Summers]]). If you want to help write honestly about women's influence on science, I'm happy to help. But please don't waste my time by trying to inject feminist propaganda. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:27, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
::It's difficult to discuss these matters, because the last time a prominent academic tried to do so, he was set up for a fall (see [[Lawrence Summers]]). If you want to help write honestly about women's influence on science, I'm happy to help. But please don't waste my time by trying to inject feminist propaganda. --[[User:Ed Poor|Ed Poor]] <sup>[[User talk:Ed Poor|Talk]]</sup> 16:27, 14 July 2010 (EDT)
:::[http://www.factmonster.com/spot/whmbios2.html These] [http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/women-in-science-pioneers-blaze-path-for-others-1924794.html links] may be of interest. The only one I had heard of, aside from Curie, was [[Rosalind Franklin]], who featured prominently in ''[[The Double Helix]]''. [[User:Tisane|Tisane]] 17:12, 14 July 2010 (EDT)