Changes

1 byte removed ,  04:09, July 13, 2016
→‎top: clean up & uniformity
Line 1: Line 1: −
The [[Congress]]ional [[Democrat]]s and [[Obama administration]]'s efforts to favor [[UAW]] workers and New Car buyers (typically households with $60,000 plus in income)<ref>http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/cash-for-clunkers-by-the-numbers/ </ref> with subsidies from the [[United States Treasury]], has been an unmitigated disaster for working families,  and the poor.  As a result of the federal spending program, working families and the poor now are faced with an average price ''increase'' of 10.3% for Used Cars.
+
The [[Congress]]ional [[Democrat]]s and [[Obama administration]]'s efforts to favor [[UAW]] workers and New Car buyers (typically households with $60,000 plus in income)<ref>http://wheels.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/08/04/cash-for-clunkers-by-the-numbers/</ref> with subsidies from the [[United States Treasury]], has been an unmitigated disaster for working families,  and the poor.  As a result of the federal spending program, working families and the poor now are faced with an average price ''increase'' of 10.3% for Used Cars.
    
The government program mandated trade-ins be crushed, leading to a shortage of used vehicles and an increase in prices. This has occurred at a time when '''[[deflation]]''', or an overall drop in prices giving consumers more money to spend, has characterized the current economic environment.
 
The government program mandated trade-ins be crushed, leading to a shortage of used vehicles and an increase in prices. This has occurred at a time when '''[[deflation]]''', or an overall drop in prices giving consumers more money to spend, has characterized the current economic environment.
Block, SkipCaptcha, apieditor, Automoderated users, Bots, edit, ratelimit-exempt
59,252

edits