Difference between revisions of "Liberals Who Refuse To Debate"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(added John Dingell, with his unjustified position) |
(Manchin) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
*Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio) | *Pro-[[abortion]] congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio) | ||
| + | *Governor and senatorial candidate Joe Manchin (West Virginia)<ref>Manchin refuses to debate his Republican opponent one-on-one, and instead agrees only to an unwieldy group debate including four candidates. [http://blogs.wvgazette.com/squawkbox/2010/10/03/did-manchin-refuse-to-debate-raese-one-on-one/]</ref> | ||
== References == | == References == | ||
Revision as of 22:02, October 10, 2010
Here is a growing list of liberals in tight races who refuse to debate their opponent, thereby depriving the public of learning their real positions on the issues:
- Pro-abortion congressman Rick Boucher (Virginia)
- Pro-abortion congressman Peter DeFazio (Oregon)
- Pro-abortion congressman John Dingell (Michigan)[1]
- Pro-abortion congressman Frank Pallone (New Jersey)
- Pro-abortion congressman Charlie Wilson (Ohio)
- Governor and senatorial candidate Joe Manchin (West Virginia)[2]
References
- ↑ After a poll showed him trailing, Dingell said he would debate ... shortly before Election Day, which he could cancel if he improves in the polls.
- ↑ Manchin refuses to debate his Republican opponent one-on-one, and instead agrees only to an unwieldy group debate including four candidates. [1]