Difference between revisions of "Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
RexMundane (talk | contribs) (Porn again) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Post comments here == | == Post comments here == | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Porn again == | ||
| + | |||
| + | So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition would require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up. Marvelous. Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir. --[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:32, April 5, 2007
| ! | Due to the controversial nature of this article, it has been locked by the Administrators to prevent edit wars or vandalism. Sysops, please do not unlock it without first consulting the protecting sysop. |
|
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive1
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive2
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive3
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia/Archive4
Post comments here
Porn again
So no explanation of how opposing regulation of media (which is what opposition would require) is a liberal viewpoint, simply the statement that it is de facto the case without a lick of evidence to back it up. Marvelous. Your book deal with Regnery is a shoe in now sir. --RexMundane 20:32, 4 April 2007 (EDT)