Changes

Line 140: Line 140:     
Your characterization of what happened doesn't mean that is the actualization of what happened. However, you are certainly free to ''think'' that's what happened. Therefore, you do have freedom of thought. On the other hand, we cannot act without impunity. Actions can be limited or rendered by a higher authority. (That authority, by the way, can be reduced, replaced or eliminated if the authority is not used in a just manner.) I'm quite sure the authority acted in a just manner. Therefore, you've provided a perfect example of conservative principals in action. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:05, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
 
Your characterization of what happened doesn't mean that is the actualization of what happened. However, you are certainly free to ''think'' that's what happened. Therefore, you do have freedom of thought. On the other hand, we cannot act without impunity. Actions can be limited or rendered by a higher authority. (That authority, by the way, can be reduced, replaced or eliminated if the authority is not used in a just manner.) I'm quite sure the authority acted in a just manner. Therefore, you've provided a perfect example of conservative principals in action. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:05, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
 +
 +
: Folks, this is a serious site.  We mean it.  One more example of silly sarcasm here will result in an account block.  I'm not kidding and I'm tired of wasting time on this.--[[User:Aschlafly|Aschlafly]] 14:09, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Anthony, Irenaeus, Siteadmin, apieditor, Bureaucrats, Check users, nsAm_Govt_101RO, nsAm_Govt_101RW, nsAm_Govt_101_ta, nsJudgesRO, nsJudgesRW, nsJudges_talkRO, nsJudges_talkRW, nsTeam2RO, nsTeam2RW, nsTeam2_talkRO, nsTeam2_talkRW, oversight, Administrators
126,552

edits