767
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 137:
Line 137: + + +
Talk:Examples of Bias in Wikipedia (view source)
Revision as of 18:05, April 5, 2007
, 18:05, April 5, 2007→More bias
::"Here in the conservative world, people are free to think what they want to think."
::"Here in the conservative world, people are free to think what they want to think."
::Um, I just got threatened with a ban for not agreeing to a conclusion that is argued using quite evidently flawed math. We, in fact, aren't free to think here, we're free to conform or be punished. Just clearing that up for you, since you didn't seem to realize.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 14:00, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
::Um, I just got threatened with a ban for not agreeing to a conclusion that is argued using quite evidently flawed math. We, in fact, aren't free to think here, we're free to conform or be punished. Just clearing that up for you, since you didn't seem to realize.--[[User:RexMundane|RexMundane]] 14:00, 5 April 2007 (EDT)
Your characterization of what happened doesn't mean that is the actualization of what happened. However, you are certainly free to ''think'' that's what happened. Therefore, you do have freedom of thought. On the other hand, we cannot act without impunity. Actions can be limited or rendered by a higher authority. (That authority, by the way, can be reduced, replaced or eliminated if the authority is not used in a just manner.) I'm quite sure the authority acted in a just manner. Therefore, you've provided a perfect example of conservative principals in action. [[User:Everwill|Everwill]] 14:05, 5 April 2007 (EDT)