Difference between revisions of "Talk:Dan Savage"

Revision as of 21:01, June 7, 2011

If the subject matter is approved, should I link to Dan Savage's blog? The Stranger's advertisements often include call girls and such, and Savage's blog is often about sex. I hesitate, since I know linking from here would be straying from CP's family-friendly intent, but at the same time, it's kind of an important link. He doesn't have another site, to my knowledge.--CamilleT 11:50, 6 June 2011 (EDT)

It is not appropriate to discuss any of the important details of this disgusting man or the Santorum business on this website. Nate 12:42, 6 June 2011 (EDT)

Well, you've been here longer than I, but I would prefer the opinion of an administrator. Savage is a prominent figure on the left, and he has had a definite impact on politics. My intention with this article was to make it vague where anything lewd would be.--CamilleT 13:55, 6 June 2011 (EDT)

The external link might not be appropriate, but a biographical scetch on the man, his agenda and methods is very much of interest. Is there another link available that gives us a fair picture of the substance of his blog?

P.S., is this the same Dan Savage cited here, I won't ban anybody just now... Tue, 15 May 2007 22:19:38 -0700? From RW 1.0, "I suppose it is too much to ask Dan Savage (or Jon Stewart?) to help us googlebomb the term? ..." Rob Smith 15:27, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

I was not involved in the group or discussion you linked to.--CamilleT 16:52, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

It appears Savage is an old hand at Google bombing; he was once considered a contact to help make the names NAMBLA & Conservapedia interchangeable the same way he did Santorum and fecel material. Is there a way to work this cite into the narrative? Rob Smith 17:01, 7 June 2011 (EDT)

spellcheck

Edit summaries are not subject to firefox's spell check. lol--CamilleT 16:51, 7 June 2011 (EDT)