Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Undo revision 886729 by Sciencemaster (talk) Blatant trolling
Line 14: Line 14:  
#The [[action-at-a-distance]] by Jesus, described in [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]] and [[Matthew 20-28 (Translated)|Matthew 27:51]].
 
#The [[action-at-a-distance]] by Jesus, described in [[John 1-7 (Translated)|John 4:46-54]] and [[Matthew 20-28 (Translated)|Matthew 27:51]].
 
#Newly observed data reveal that a fundamental constant of physics, α (alpha), actually varies throughout the universe, demonstrating that all inertial frames of reference do '''not''' experience identical laws of physics as claimed by Relativity.<ref>For a report on the data, see a paper submitted in 2010 by John Webb and Julian King of the University of new South Wales, Australia, to the ''Physical Review Letters''.</ref>
 
#Newly observed data reveal that a fundamental constant of physics, α (alpha), actually varies throughout the universe, demonstrating that all inertial frames of reference do '''not''' experience identical laws of physics as claimed by Relativity.<ref>For a report on the data, see a paper submitted in 2010 by John Webb and Julian King of the University of new South Wales, Australia, to the ''Physical Review Letters''.</ref>
−
#The double star "W13" weighs "40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a [[black hole]].  So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense." This is because stars have to collapse before they form black holes. I learned that in 8th grade, why dont you ignorant gentelmen know this?<ref>http://www.economist.com/node/17035953</ref>
+
#The double star "W13" weighs "40 times as much as the sun—more than enough to form a [[black hole]].  So why is it not a black hole? The only explanation [a leading scientist] can think of ... does not make astrophysical sense."<ref>http://www.economist.com/node/17035953</ref>
 
#The inability of the theory to lead to other insights (other than the prediction of the deflection of starlight during the 1919 total solar eclipse, gravitational lensing of distant galaxies, and gravitational microlensing), contrary to every verified theory of physics.
 
#The inability of the theory to lead to other insights (other than the prediction of the deflection of starlight during the 1919 total solar eclipse, gravitational lensing of distant galaxies, and gravitational microlensing), contrary to every verified theory of physics.
 
#The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref>
 
#The change in mass over time of standard kilograms preserved under ideal conditions.<ref>[[Mystery:Why Is the Kilogram Losing Weight?]]</ref>
176

edits

Navigation menu