Changes

no edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:  
* I propose that we use the king james version for this entry.
 
* I propose that we use the king james version for this entry.
 
** Why? Personally, I believe we should keep the NIV because it gives a more precise meaning for some of the words. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 11:17, 5 January 2007 (EST)
 
** Why? Personally, I believe we should keep the NIV because it gives a more precise meaning for some of the words. [[User:PhilipB|PhilipB]] 11:17, 5 January 2007 (EST)
 +
 +
:::Because the King James version is so familiar, so beloved, and of such great ''literary'' importance, it seems to me that if an article is describing a ''familiar'' or ''frequently quoted'' passage in the Bible, it should present ''both'' a (presumably more) accurate modern translation ''and also'' the more frequently quoted King James version. Just my $0.02. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:25, 5 January 2007 (EST)
4,994

edits