4,994
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: + +
no edit summary
:::Because the King James version is so familiar, so beloved, and of such great ''literary'' importance, it seems to me that if an article is describing a ''familiar'' or ''frequently quoted'' passage in the Bible, it should present ''both'' a (presumably more) accurate modern translation ''and also'' the more frequently quoted King James version. Just my $0.02. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:25, 5 January 2007 (EST)
:::Because the King James version is so familiar, so beloved, and of such great ''literary'' importance, it seems to me that if an article is describing a ''familiar'' or ''frequently quoted'' passage in the Bible, it should present ''both'' a (presumably more) accurate modern translation ''and also'' the more frequently quoted King James version. Just my $0.02. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:25, 5 January 2007 (EST)
:::P. S. Obviously the King James text continues to be such a mental landmark that even if we use modern language for the commandments themselves, we still call them "The Ten Commandments" rather than "The Ten Laws" or "The Ten Commands." [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith]] 12:31, 5 January 2007 (EST)