Changes

Samsonn, by the way, I have noticed that many atheists employ the [[fallacy of exclusion]]. Are you an atheist? Do you have proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 10:11, 13 November 2011 (EST)

Samsonn, by the way, I have noticed that many atheists employ the [[fallacy of exclusion]]. Are you an atheist? Do you have proof and evidence that atheism is true? [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 10:11, 13 November 2011 (EST)

I am not an atheist. I am a moderate Christian, and consider the bible allegorical, but that is irrelevant. I do not let my religious views get in the way of my science. Evolution is in the field of biology, so biologists are the best people to get knowledge from in this area, not creationists (many of whom don't even seem to even understand evolution, perhaps because attempts have been made to censor it from our schooling)--[[User:Samsonnn|Samsonnn]] 12:27, 13 November 2011 (EST)

I am not an atheist. I am a moderate Christian, and consider the bible allegorical, but that is irrelevant. I do not let my religious views get in the way of my science. Evolution is in the field of biology, so biologists are the best people to get knowledge from in this area, not creationists (many of whom don't even seem to even understand evolution, perhaps because attempts have been made to censor it from our schooling)

 

Regarding the link to the Conservapedia section of 'lack of transitional forms', I have made it clear that I find it fallacious; that is why I am talking about it here, so I can get a consensus to correct it. And the links to the creationist website are full of fallacies also. And as I have said, because it was written by a creationist, who has clearly already made up his mind about evolution, and not a biologist, then I don't think that it is a reliable citation. Give me a link to the work of an actual scientist and I will listen. --[[User:Samsonnn|Samsonnn]] 12:27, 13 November 2011 (EST)