Difference between revisions of "Talk:Atheism"
From Conservapedia
MaxFletcher (Talk | contribs) m (→Definition) |
Conservative (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. In addition, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST) | ::Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. In addition, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST) | ||
:::What Dawkins says is irrelevant - is atheism not the denial of all and any god(s)? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:40, 15 November 2011 (EST) | :::What Dawkins says is irrelevant - is atheism not the denial of all and any god(s)? [[User:MaxFletcher|MaxFletcher]] 16:40, 15 November 2011 (EST) | ||
| + | ::::You didn't respond adequately to my response to you and instead chose to focus merely on the last sentence of my response. This often seems to be your modus operandi and as a result, I am not interested in discussing the matter further with you. I have better things to do with my time than attempt to discuss things with a brick wall. [[User:Conservative|Conservative]] 17:27, 15 November 2011 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 22:27, November 15, 2011
| Set 2 of Archives |
| Set 1 of Archives |
Contents
Definition
Just as an a quick aside should the main definition read "denial of the existence of a God and/or Gods?" MaxFletcher 18:08, 14 November 2011 (EST)
- I would have made the change but it appears I can't. Anyone? MaxFletcher 16:00, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. In addition, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. Conservative 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- What Dawkins says is irrelevant - is atheism not the denial of all and any god(s)? MaxFletcher 16:40, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- You didn't respond adequately to my response to you and instead chose to focus merely on the last sentence of my response. This often seems to be your modus operandi and as a result, I am not interested in discussing the matter further with you. I have better things to do with my time than attempt to discuss things with a brick wall. Conservative 17:27, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- What Dawkins says is irrelevant - is atheism not the denial of all and any god(s)? MaxFletcher 16:40, 15 November 2011 (EST)
- Most of our audience is in the Anglosphere or in the Western World or at least been influenced by the Western World (such as India) plus the Encyclopedias of Philosophy cited are Western World philosophy reference works which are monotheistic in perspective so it is fine the way it is. In addition, you don't see Richard Dawkins and company often ranting about Shiva, etc. Conservative 16:15, 15 November 2011 (EST)
