Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jpatt"
(→Rubio) |
(→Rubio) |
||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
:Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST) | :Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --[[User:Jpatt|Jpatt]] 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Thank you, I will. I dkn't apprive of name calling, either. [[User:RachelW|RachelW]] 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 18:25, January 20, 2012
Archive 2008
Archive 2009
Archive 2010
Archive 2011
Blank3r
Good job stopping him.JonM 14:40, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Adambro
Hi Jpatt, what did you mean by "AdamBro is clan but keep on eye on him. Sock puppets of BL4NK3R; NoohWicky, UtterMuppet, Maggie, B0LLL0X". Is he a sockpuppet ? --PhilipN 17:04, 11 January 2012 (EST)
- AdamBro is clean, as far as socks are involved. He might be what Tony has said, so follow his future edits.--Jpatt 17:10, 11 January 2012 (EST)
- I will, thanks for the info. --PhilipN 17:15, 11 January 2012 (EST)
Thank you
Thanks for the welcome and reverting vandalism on my user and talk page! I don't understand that vandal --- it was my first day and I don't think i wrote anything controversial, why would anyone do that to me? Lansing 12:02, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- Get used to liberal intimidation. We can block their ideology but they counter with vandalism. --Jpatt 12:15, 12 January 2012 (EST)
- What a shame, indeed. Lansing 14:35, 13 January 2012 (EST)
I think KendallP/BostonBakedBeans23 realized he wasn't following the name rule, and so changed it so he wouldn't get blocked. DynaboyJ 14:17, 16 January 2012 (EST)
- You would like to see Kendall unblocked?--Jpatt 14:24, 16 January 2012 (EST)
- Yes, and thank you for unblocking him. DynaboyJ 14:28, 16 January 2012 (EST)
Rubio
I'm curious as to why you reverted my edit? Everything I said was true and sourced. Ayzmo :) 13:18, 20 January 2012 (EST)
Calling him a liberal is just tit for tat namecalling, but his support for PIPA is well documented. That should stay in the article.RachelW 13:20, 20 January 2012 (EST)
- Add the PIPA stuff. Keep the liberal statement out. --Jpatt 13:23, 20 January 2012 (EST)
- Thank you, I will. I dkn't apprive of name calling, either. RachelW 13:25, 20 January 2012 (EST)