Difference between revisions of "Talk:Law of Large Numbers"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "==The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution== You can't apply the Law of Large Numbers to a time series with a trend. That's just bad math, not a co...") |
(→The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution: The Theory of Evolution, as it is commonly taught, does claim that some new species arose due to random fluctuations.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution== | ==The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution== | ||
You can't apply the Law of Large Numbers to a time series with a trend. That's just bad math, not a counterexample! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 20:11, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | You can't apply the Law of Large Numbers to a time series with a trend. That's just bad math, not a counterexample! [[User:AugustO|AugustO]] 20:11, 14 March 2012 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :The Theory of Evolution, as it is commonly taught, does claim that some new species arose due to random fluctuations. | ||
Revision as of 00:22, March 15, 2012
The Law of Large Numbers is a Counterexample to the Theory of Evolution
You can't apply the Law of Large Numbers to a time series with a trend. That's just bad math, not a counterexample! AugustO 20:11, 14 March 2012 (EDT)
- The Theory of Evolution, as it is commonly taught, does claim that some new species arose due to random fluctuations.